Case Packing and Integrating End of Line Packaging Equipment

Posted by Kelly Wathen

You've done your market research, created a product that your customers love, and developed and implement world-class production with top-notch quality and now there is only one thing left to do; pack the boxes and ship the product. What are my options for case erecting, packing, and sealing? Should we just manually build and load the boxes, or should we completely automate?

The reality is that case packing, and the integration of end of line packaging equipment, falls on a continuum from fully manual to fully automated. It’s important to know what all of your options are so you can choose the best solutions for your specific situation.

Stacking_boxes.jpgManual Case Erecting and Packing

Building and packing cases by hand have some obvious benefits that include:

  • Requires little training and operators can be up and running quickly
  • People can easily adjust for case variations
  • Easy to inspect products, load into packaging, and adjust as needed

However, there are negatives to manual packing and erecting operations, most notably:

  • Ergonomics and repetitive motion injury risk for operators
  • May need multiple people to maintain required run rates

How much are you losing by manually erecting your cartons? Download our free  Case Calculator and find out now.

Fully Automated Case Erecting, Packing, and Sealing

end of line packaging

Fully automating case erecting, case packing, and case sealing sounds great in theory. This type of set up is used extensively for high volume, low variation end of line situations. For these applications, automation reduces headcount and increases packaging line output.

If the products and packaging are very consistent and run at high volumes, then full automation may be the answer. Case and product variations, however, can cause problems like jamming the suction cups and stopping production.

Another downside of full automation is that the machines necessary to fully automate need to be purchased and integrated into your existing set up which is expensive and requires skilled operators to set up, run, and maintain the equipment. There is also a time overhead to design, build, integrate, install, test, and debug a fully automated system.

Once up and running full automation also requires maintenance and things like spare parts and downtime for preventive maintenance.

100% automation also isn’t possible for every situation. Something as simple as putting products in a box can have its challenges, particularly when the products are irregular, complex, or expensive. In these circumstances, conventional pick and place automation often doesn’t work well or can be prohibitively expensive.

Somewhere In Between

What if case erecting and sealing are automated, consistent, and the packing is done by hand?

A middle ground approach to automation allows the machines and people to do what they do best. The human/machine combination is the best of both worlds in that it incorporates what machines do best, rote work, and what humans do best, make judgments.

People are flexible and when guided by informed judgment deliver adjustments on the fly. An operator can inspect products as they are picking it up, and then insert it properly into a case or remove it from the line for future re-work or inspection. People make adjustments on the fly and deal with a wide variety of situations without causing the line to stop.

A combination of people and automation works for low to moderate volume applications of up to 10 cases per minute. 

A few other things to consider when deciding on manual and automated case packing are:

  • On average, a medium-sized case can be erected and sealed by hand in 20 seconds per unit. How many case per minute do you need?
  • How big are the products going into the case?  If large, or small and delicate, case packing will slow down.
  • How many people do you have available to erect, pack, and seal cases? In the video, one person is handling the equivalent of 3-4 operators doing all steps manually.

There are potential issues with a mix of manual and automation; including, the need to maintain the automation, the need for some mechanical infrastructure (like clean, dry air), and carrying spare parts for the automation.

Manual vs. Automation: Questions to Ask

  • Evaluate the tradeoffs of costs of capital vs. hourly labor.
  • Are you running regular daily production?
  • Determine the speed tradeoffs of manual vs. automation.
  • How many cases per day? Need approximately 500 per day for hybrid solution.
  • Do you have few changeovers?
  • What is the impact of case quality and reduced defects in packing of goods?
  • How many people do you have packing and making boxes? If 4 to 8 operators, consider the hybrid approach.
  • Do the net gains outweigh costs?

Check out this video for an example of a hybrid approach using both human and machine for maximum end of line packaging efficiency.

There is no one right way to build cases, pack them, and seal them for shipment. Instead, there is a range of options, and a hybrid approach can yield the best return in many situations. 

If you would like to talk to one of the experts at Lantech to discuss the right approach for your end of line packaging requirements, please contact us.

You may be interested in these related posts:

 MOFU - Automatic Case Erector Savings Guide

This post was published on November 14, 2018 and updated on November 14, 2018.

Topics: Case Packing

New call-to-action
Stretch wrapping is the solution. Find out why.
Semi-Automatic Stretch Wrapper Buying Guide

Latest Posts